5227

.. not sure why they didn’t do it for the 5227

Managed to try this at my AD, am surprised they already have it I find the hands and hr indices too intensely black, same as the 6196P salmon.. not very convinced

More seriously, I have always had a soft spot for the celestial complication and the 6105G is very cool but it is also out of reach. The 5610/1P is lovely but in a small collection it would only make sense instead of my blue 5711/1A which has been getting

But 47mm is very large even for a lugless watch.. in any case, it’s cool to see a lugless patek case I particularly like the 5810/1G and 5227G Finally a dateless 2 hand nautilus and it’s nice that they reworked the 5227 case to thicken the bezel.. the pre

1. 6105G-001: It dares to present a design they never did before. The Richard Mille for intellectuals, if you will... 2. 5810/1G-001: The 41mm size and the 240 microrotor movement makes this very compelling to me and I would love to own one (if that happe

Indeed, I've recently been captivated, and somewhat obsessed, with vintage. But what a pleasure to rediscover it. What serenity in this design!

I think it's the best case (to my taste) I have ever seen

I like the 5196 very much. Owned the G and R. But sold both watches as too thin and dressy for me. The case back was as well a bit underwhelming. I owned as well 6119G (too large) and 5227R (I missed the double index at 12). My current fav and still in my

Where do you stand on the 5196G? Is it worthy of its historical lineage? The 5196g is the Patek I like. Discreet elegance that you only glimpse under the sleeve. A path that modern Patek has largely lost. I don't like the 6119. The mouvement should be big

I've tried on the 5227 back in 2021 and wasn't fully convinced (date disc not matching the dial on R or J variant, not feeling very attracted towards the central rotor), but I would like to try it on again someday to see if I still feel the same way becau